What is a Classic Liberal?

Americans who still believe in the Constitution and the protections it offers are more in line with Classic Liberals than modern conservatives. Unfortunately, the word 'liberal' has been highjacked by leftists, Marxists, Socialists and Communists. It has not always been that way. Many of our founding fathers considered themselves to be Classic Liberals and the Constitution reflects many of those values. 

Classic Liberalism advocates private property, an unhampered economy between consenting citizens, the rule of law, the right to keep and bear arms, constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and of the press, and other principles that are found in the Bill of Rights. Although there were many differences between individuals and groups of founding fathers, these principles of classic liberalism are what bound them together to produce not only the Constitution but the very essence of the nation.

The father of Classic Liberalism is John Locke, who believed that

  • work creates private property and value
  • people have unalienable rights to life, liberty and property
  • all people are born equal and free
  • there should be a separation of government powers.

Another famous Classic Liberal was Adam Smith who is also the father of classical liberal economics. He penned the famous treatise, The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Smith gave us the principles of competition, supply and demand and self-interest in making economic decisions. 

However, there were other labels that also defined some of the Founding Fathers. Some were Democrats, who favored some elements of democracy. Some were Federalists who favored a confederation or federation of states. Some were Republicans who favored a republic form of government.

In general, however, all of them could be considered Patriots because they loved freedom and liberty and hated the rule of monarchs in England. No matter how heated the arguments became, and they were all known for spirited debate, they still retained the core values of Classic Liberals.

In 1776, there was also a group of citizens called Conservatives, but they were considered Loyalists to the Crown. They favored a  power structure where the few ruled the many, and sought to mold America to be compatible with the Crown while not severing all ties with it. In other words, they stressed changing the existing system to be more sympathetic with their goals, rather than replacing it with a brand new system. 

We can be thankful that those Conservatives did not win the day over the Classic Liberals in 1776, or we might not be here today. However, in today's political arena, we see exactly the same struggle playing out. Just about every citizen today complains about how little difference there is between the Democrat and Republican parties, and how a two party system always seems to just give us more of the same. This is true because both parties are basically cut from the same cloth: the Democrats (progressives) want radical change and big government; the Republicans (conservatives) say "Whoa, not so fast" and propose goals that lead to the same conclusion, perhaps more slowly but they lead to the same end. 

For those who revere the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, perhaps reclaiming the title 'Classic Liberal' is a good thing. 

In any case, Citizens for Free Speech is driven by the First Amendment that was taken straight out of the Classic Liberal philosophical playbook, and we are proud of it. These values are worth fighting for.

Benjamin Franklin wrote, "Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government. When this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved." He also said, "Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost."

If you believe Franklin knew what he was talking about, then the stakes in today's America are very high as it grapples with rank censorship, oppression of an open press, political correctness and bullying in the public square. This rancor serves no one except Democrats and Republicans and leaves the backbone of America - its citizens - to set record straight again. 

We dare not squander the opportunity.

 

 

 


Showing 5 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Stephen Duval
    commented 2018-10-16 08:42:41 -0700 · Flag
    Free speech is the foundation of our democracy. The development of the Internet was a major advance for free speech. However the Progressives see that free speech on the Internet is interfering with their control of the media and they are colluding with Silicon Valley to suppress conservative speech before the mid terms and especially before the 2020 election.

    Social media monopolies, (Facebook, YouTube, Twitter) are converting their economic power into political power. They are threatening our democracy.

    It is the responsibility of the federal government to deal with monopolies. Forcing the social media monopolies to be content neutral, ie. making it illegal for them to discriminate against any content, would solve the problem and not impact the First Amendment.

    Truly objectionable material should be handled as a criminal matter by the police within the bounds of the First Amendment. The liability should fall on the person making the post rather than on the platform. The social media platforms are like printing presses and the users are the publishers.

    https://www.libertynation.com/social-media-converts-economic-monopoly-into-political-power/
  • Mary Baker
    commented 2018-09-05 07:38:22 -0700
    Good one Diana!
  • Diana Gomez
    commented 2018-09-05 07:35:57 -0700
    When a person says they are a Democrat, I ask if they are a 1776 Democrat or a Communist.
  • Pamela Tackett
    followed this page 2018-09-04 12:38:24 -0700
  • Patrick Wood
    published this page in Blog 2018-06-04 20:50:36 -0700